EXAMPLE
- the cash is received and taxed in year 1, but the income is split between
years 1, 2 and 3. This might occur when an advance payment is received for a
long-term contract.
|
||||
|
Year 1
|
Year 2
|
Year 3
|
|
Income
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
|
Tax expense @ 24%
|
-144
|
0
|
0
|
|
Net profit
|
56
|
200
|
200
|
|
The income is the same for each
year, but the net profit changes due to the tax payment. The income in years
2 & 3 is taxed in the first year.
Deferred tax is used to apportion
the tax charge to match the income:
|
||||
|
Year 1
|
Year 2
|
Year 3
|
|
Income
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
|
Tax expense @ 24%
|
-144
|
0
|
0
|
|
Deferred tax @ 24%
|
+96
|
-48
|
-48
|
|
Net profit
|
152
|
152
|
152
|
|
The
total tax charge for year 1 will be 48 (144 minus 96), so the Income
Statement for each year will be the same.
The
deferred tax reduces the tax charge in year 1, but increases it in years 2
& 3.
|
||||
EXAMPLE -expenses attract tax credits (‘tax
income’).
If a transaction takes place in
year 1 and tax is credited in year 2, year 1 will show a transaction without
a tax credit, and year 2 will show a tax credit without a transaction:
|
||
|
Year 1
|
Year 2
|
Expense
|
-100
|
0
|
Tax income @ 24%
|
0
|
+24
|
Net profit
|
-100
|
+24
|
The tax income, or benefit of
paying less tax due to the expense, is a direct result of the expense in
period 1. Readers of financial statements should be made aware that tax will
be credited in the following year.
Deferred tax is used to accrue future
tax credits generated by transactions in the current year.
|
||
|
Year 1
|
Year 2
|
Expense
|
-100
|
0
|
Tax income @ 24%
|
0
|
+24
|
Deferred tax @ 24%
|
+24
|
-24
|
Net profit
|
-76
|
0
|
On the balance sheet, this
deferred tax would be shown as an asset at the end of period 1. It will
disappear at the end of period 2 by being reversed.
|
EXAMPLE-
tax is credited on payment of the money in period 1, but only treated as an
expense in period 2.
|
||
|
Year 1
|
Year 2
|
Expense
|
0
|
-100
|
Tax income @ 24%
|
+24
|
0
|
Net profit
|
+24
|
-100
|
In year 1 there is a tax credit
without a transaction. In year 2 there is a transaction without a tax credit.
The tax will be shown as a prepayment.
Again, we use deferred tax to link
the transaction to the tax credit.
|
||
|
Year 1
|
Year 2
|
Expense
|
0
|
-100
|
Tax income @ 24%
|
+24
|
0
|
Deferred tax @ 24%
|
-24
|
+24
|
Net profit
|
0
|
-76
|
In this case, it accrues a tax
credit in year 1 to carry forward the tax paid to period 2 to link with the
timing of the transaction. It is reversed in year 2.
|
EXAMPLE- an advance payment on a
construction contract.
The
cash is paid and credited for tax in year 1, but the expense is split between
years 1, 2 and 3.
|
||||
|
Year 1
|
Year 2
|
Year 3
|
|
Expense
|
-200
|
-200
|
-200
|
|
Tax income @ 24%
|
+144
|
0
|
0
|
|
Net profit
|
-56
|
-200
|
-200
|
|
The expense is the same for each year, but the net
profit changes due to the tax credit. The expense in years 2 & 3 is
credited for tax in the first year.
Deferred tax is used to apportion
the tax credit by accrual to match the expense:
|
||||
|
Year 1
|
Year 2
|
Year 3
|
|
Expense
|
-200
|
-200
|
-200
|
|
Tax income @ 24%
|
144
|
0
|
0
|
|
Deferred tax @ 24%
|
-96
|
+48
|
+48
|
|
Net profit
|
-152
|
-152
|
-152
|
|
The
total tax credit for year 1 will be 48 (144 minus 96), so the Income
Statement for each year will be the same, matching the economic reality. The
deferred tax reduces the tax credit in year 1, but increases it in years 2
& 3.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment